As the rigid yet apparently baseless policies are still being implemented in many countries today, leaders and citizens, without really enough knowledge, awaits the vaccine promised by Bill Gates and other entities with interest in profit from this so-called “solution”. Why baseless? Just a few days ago, the World Health Organization (WHO) has announced that the rate of the alleged COVID patients who are thought to be asymptomatic carriers were practically low; meaning that the WHO accepted that this case, which is supposed to be one of the main reasons for lockdown, has almost nothing to do with the measures being put out. These measures, however, have caused huge global economic ruins and even physical and mental health damage to many people. In short, it is another huge error.
Bill Gates, who is neither a doctor nor a health scientist just like the WHO director Tedros Adhanon, appears to be one of the major decision makers for this crisis. If you wonder why this is happening, this is for the reason that Gates, through his philanthropic front, GAVI or the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization, also known as the GAVI alliance, has been injecting huge amount of dollars to the major institutions like the WHO for decades.
To really understand this, one must see how Bill Gates’ tentacles reach and influence major players of crisis like this. In one instance, globalresearch.ca wrote:
“Second only to the USA, the BMGF is one of the largest donors to the World Health Organization (WHO) and paid it more than $200 million in 2018 – more than Germany, France and Sweden combined in the same period. But this is not the only way in which the WHO is financed by Gates. GAVI, formerly known as the “Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation”, provided the WHO with an additional $150 million in 2018. One of GAVI’s main donors is again the BMGF, with $1.5 billion in 2016, for example.”
The writer also proceeded to elaborate:
“It can therefore be said that the BMGF and thus the Gates family and Warren Buffett are the main source of income for the WHO through direct and indirect channels, which raises questions about its independence from these sources of finance. In addition, the BMGF also provided funding for the establishment of the “Coalition for Epidemic Prevention Innovation” (CEPI), which is concerned with the research and development of vaccines, amounting to around $100 million in 2017. In addition, the Foundation regularly supports non-governmental organisations such as PATH, which are involved in the development of vaccination technologies, with millions of dollars in funding. The list of BMGF’s beneficiaries also includes the largest global pharmaceutical companies, such as Pfizer, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline and Sanofi Aventis. The comprehensive influence of the BMGF in the vaccination sector is therefore obvious.”
So it’s clear that the Gates Foundation and these big pharmaceutical companies have efficiently collaborated together to fund organizations dedicated to vaccinate the whole population such as GAVI. These instruments, including the Global Health Innovative Technology Fund, and the Program for Appropriate Technology in Health (PATH) are public-private partnerships that have been initiated to conduct large-scale clinical trials in the developing countries such as Africa and South Asia. Unfortunately, it didn’t turn out right. Speaking as if he has already known how countries and people would react and behave during this crisis, Gates wrote on his blog:
“I think that low-income countries should be some of the first to receive it (COVID-19 vaccine), because people will be at a much higher risk of dying in those places. COVID-19 will spread much quicker in poor countries because measures like physical distancing are harder to enact. More people have poor underlying health that makes them more vulnerable to complications, and weak health systems will make it harder for them to receive the care they need. Getting the vaccine out in low-income countries could save millions of lives. The good news is we already have an organization with expertise about how to do this in GAVI, The Vaccine Alliance.”
For those who didn’t know, WHO’s current director Tedros Adhanon, who is, again, not a doctor and not a scientist, is the former Chairman of GAVI Vaccine Alliance. According to them, “GAVI’s sole mission is to vaccinate every child in the world”. But what is really going on with the population after the GAVI was set up? How does GAVI really impacted these recipient nations? In Africa for example, this is what experts have reported:
“Africa soon experienced an “unprecedented increase in health research involving humans” who were typically “poverty-stricken and poorly educated”. The results were predictably lethal. In 2010 the Gates Foundation funded a Phase III trial of a malaria vaccine developed by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), administering the experimental treatment to thousands of infants across seven African countries. Eager to secure the WHO approval necessary to license the vaccine for global distribution, GSK and BMGF declared the trials a “smashing success”, and the popular press uncritically reproduced the publicity. Few bothered to look closely at the study’s fine print, which revealed that the trials resulted in 151 deaths and caused “serious adverse effects” (e.g., paralysis, seizures, febrile convulsions) in 1048 of 5949 children aged 5-17 months. Similar stories emerged in the wake of the Gates-funded MenAfriVac campaign in Chad, where unconfirmed reports alleged that 50 of 500 children forcibly vaccinated for meningitis later developed paralysis. Citing additional abuses, a South African newspaper declared: “We are guinea pigs for the drugmakers.”
It was estimated by Barbara Loe Fisher at the National Vaccine Information Center that “only about 10 percent of total funding provided by GAVI ($862M) was used to strengthen health systems in developing countries, such as improving sanitation and nutrition, while nearly 80 percent was used to purchase, deliver and promote vaccines.” This makes one question why. Another report about GAVI’s impact was also reported in several outlets:
“One of the more controversial incidences is the WHO’s collaboration with the Bill Gates funded GAVI Vaccine Alliance campaign to launch the pentavalent vaccine (diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, HIP and Hepatitis B) in Africa and later in South and Southeast Asia. In India, health officials recorded upwards to 8,190 additional infant deaths annually following pentavalent vaccination. The WHO response was to reclassify its adverse event reporting system to disregard “infant” deaths altogether. Dr. Jacob Puliyel, a member of the Indian government’s National Technical Advisory Group on Immunization concluded.”
The report also went on to lay out GAVI’s impact to India through its another “life savior” called HPV (Human Papilloma Virus) vaccine:
“In 2010 seven adolescent tribal girls in Gujarat and Andhra Pradesh died after receiving injections of HPV (Human Papilloma Virus) vaccines as part of a large-scale “demonstrational study” funded by the Gates Foundation and administered by PATH. The vaccines, developed by GSK and Merck, were given to approximately 23,000 girls between 10 and 14 years of age, ostensibly to guard against cervical cancers they might develop in old age.
Extrapolating from trial data, Indian physicians later estimated that at least 1,200 girls experienced severe side effects or developed auto-immune disorders as a result of the injections. No follow-up examinations or medical care were offered to the victims. Further investigations revealed pervasive violations of ethical norms: vulnerable village girls were virtually press-ganged into the trials, their parents bullied into signing consent forms they could not read by PATH representatives who made false claims about the safety and efficacy of the drugs. In many cases signatures were simply forged.”